Royal

Non-competition Agreements - What Are Employers Really Getting with These Documents?

Mar 19, 2021
employee sign a non-competition agreement

Everyone is aware of the honeymoon phase of the employment relationship — that time period when the employee begins work and both parties are filled with high expectations for the relationship.


Possibly, prior to beginning the relationship, an employer has the employee sign a non-competition agreement as a sort of prenuptial agreement, hoping to never have to use it. However, fast-forward a few years, the employment relationship goes sour, and the employee leaves the company. Not only does the employee leave the company, but they also begin soliciting clients, or maybe even fellow employees, to join them at their new place of employment.


As employers are aware, Massachusetts enacted the Noncompetition Agreement Act in 2018. Prior to the act, there was little restriction on the contents of a non-competition agreement other than what terms would be enforced by a court in the event of a dispute. That changed with the provisions of the act. Now, in the scenario above, if the employer sought to enforce the non-competition agreement, it would need to pay the former employee not to work during the competition period.

This is because the act mandates that, to be enforceable, a non-competition agreement must contain a ‘garden-leave clause,’ defined as 50% of the employee’s highest annualized salary within the two years preceding termination.


“While the Noncompetition Agreement Act requires employers to pay former employees not to work, there may be other options available to employers.”


Employers therefore must answer the question: what do I really want with a non-competition agreement? Is it to stop the former employee from working? Or is the goal to maintain the status of my business? If the goal is to maintain the status of the business, employers may be able to utilize non-solicitation and non-disclosure agreements, which can protect the former employer’s interests while also allowing the former employee to work.


Both such agreements are excluded from the definition of ‘non-competition agreement’ by the act, meaning they do not need to include garden-leave clauses.


A non-solicitation agreement does not prohibit a former employee from working for a competitor when the employment relationship ends. Instead, it serves to prohibit the former employee from soliciting clients and other employees of the former employer to join them at their new place of employment. A non-solicitation agreement can therefore be an effective tool in preserving the current status of the business by prohibiting a former employee from taking clients and other employees with them to their new place of employment.


A non-disclosure agreement also does not prohibit a former employee from working for a competitor when the employment relationship ends. Nor does it prohibit the former employee from soliciting clients and other employees from joining them at their new place of employment. Instead, it serves to prohibit the former employee from disclosing any confidential information from the former employer. The confidential information protected could be a trade secret or other highly sensitive material.


In short, while the Noncompetition Agreement Act requires employers to pay former employees not to work, there may be other options available to employers. It is therefore wise to consult with employment counsel to review your potential options to protect your business interests after the employment relationship has ended.


Timothy M. Netkovick, Esq. is a litigation attorney who specializes in labor and employment-law matters at the Royal Law Firm LLP, a woman-owned, women-managed corporate law firm certified as a women’s business enterprise with the Massachusetts Supplier Diversity Office, the National Assoc. of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms, and the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council; (413) 586-2288; tnetkovick@theroyallawfirm.com


This article was published in BusinessWest! Click here to visit their website.

06 Mar, 2024
Walking a Fine Line  By Trevor Brice, Esq.
14 Feb, 2024
Effective January 1, 2024, all businesses conducting and engaging in business within the United States, have one more requirement to add to their list. The Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”), was passed by Congress in 2021, and recently took effect January 1, 2024. What is it? The Act requires businesses to report their “beneficial owners” to the government through a Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) report. A “beneficial owner” is someone who owns 25% or more of the business or exercises substantial control over it. The reports are made to the United States Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which has been tasked with maintaining a national registry of beneficial owners of the reporting companies. Why was this passed? The Act is Congress’ attempt to prevent money laundering, terrorism financing, tax fraud, and other illicit activities including human and drug trafficking and securities fraud (aka prevent shell corporations and hiding money). While shell corporations are not illegal, they can be used to engage in activities that shield entities from legal liability, which is disfavored by the government and courts. Certain circumstances actually benefit from the use of a shell corporation, i.e. where companies seek to take advantage of doing business “offshore.” However, the “bad actors” who abuse this business structure have used such strategies for personal gain and, according to the government, hide from legal liability. Who does it effect? The new reporting requirement affects all businesses, corporations, and LLCs, no matter how big or small. It also affects non-US entities that are registered to conduct business with any state or territory within the United States. How do you comply? To remain in compliance with the reporting requirement, business must file the report by year end of 2024. If you create a business this year, 2024, but before January 1, 2025, you will have 90 calendar days after receiving notice of the company’s creation or registration to file the initial BOI report. Notice is actual notice received or public notice by the secretary of state, whichever is earlier. Failure to comply could lead to financial penalties or jail time. Such penalties include felony convictions, $500 daily (for every day of non-compliance) penalty up to $10,000, up to two years in prison. If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.
Share by: