Connecticut Passes Law Legalizing Cannabis

July 1, 2021

Connecticut passed a new law legalizing cannabis. Effective July 1, 2021, individuals will be able to lawfully possess, use, and consume recreational cannabis.


Smoking Restrictions

The law contains provisions restricting smoking that will affect employers. These provisions will go into effect October 1, 2021.

All employers must ban smoking and the use of electronic nicotine and cannabis vaping products in any area of their facility. Employers can no longer designate a smoking room for employees. The law applies to the inside of buildings as well as 25 feet from any doorway, window, or vent. Exceptions are limited and include tobacco or cannabis research facilities and specific licensed establishments. Employers also have the option to designate their entire property as a nonsmoking area.


Employment-Related Provisions

Another section of the law contains several provisions that will affect employers and their employment policies. These provisions will be effective July 1, 2022.


  • Employers can implement policies prohibiting the use of cannabis by employees, except for qualified patients under the state’s medical marijuana laws. Any such policy must be in writing and be made available to employees and prospective employees before it goes into effect.


  • Employers cannot terminate or take any adverse action against an employee because the employee uses cannabis outside the workplace, except when an employer has an established policy in place. 


  • Employers cannot terminate or take any adverse action against an employee or prospective employee for using cannabis prior to employment, unless it would put the employer in violation of a federal contract. 


  • The law affirms that employers have the right to maintain a drug and alcohol-free workplace and that employers may take adverse action when they have a reasonable suspicion of an employee’s cannabis use while working or when an employee shows “specific, articulable symptoms” of cannabis use while working. 


  • Employers can terminate or take adverse action against an employee after a positive drug test if the employer has a reasonable suspicion the employee is using cannabis at work, if the testing was part of an established random drug testing policy, or if the testing was for a prospective employee with a conditional job offer.


Certain employers are exempt, including: mining, utilities, construction, manufacturing, transportation/delivery, educational services, healthcare or social services, and justice, public order, and safety activities.


The law also exempts certain employee positions, including: firefighters, EMTs, police officers, positions requiring operation of a motor vehicle that requires drug testing under state or federal law, positions requiring certification of completion of a course in construction safety and health approved by OSHA, positions requiring supervision or care of children, medical patients or vulnerable persons, positions for which the law would conflict with federal law, positions funded by a federal grant, or if the provisions would conflict with an employment contract or collective bargaining agreement, and positions that an employer determines have the potential to adversely impact the health or safety of employees or the public.


Individuals aggrieved by an employer’s violation of the law can bring a civil action in superior court and may be awarded reinstatement their job or job offer, back pay, and attorney’s fees.

 

For any questions or concerns about this new Connecticut law, please contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

June 10, 2025
Brandon Calton is now admitted to the United States District Court, Connecticut! The Royal Law Firm is passionate about expanding our reach so that we can better serve our clients and their needs. Brandon is admitted in Massachusetts, the United States District Court of Massachusetts, and the United States District Court of Connecticut.
By Heather Child June 9, 2025
On May 21, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana struck down a provision in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) final rule under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), ruling that the agency exceeded its authority by requiring employers to accommodate elective abortions that are not medically necessary. Background Information: In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and eliminated the constitutional right to abortion. Congress passed the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act in December 2022, and it became effective in June 2023. The law requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodation to qualified applicants or employees who have physical or mental conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense for the employer. In April 2024, The EEOC issued its final interpretation of the PWFA including abortion in the definition of “pregnancy, childbirth, or other related medical conditions” thereby requiring employers to provide accommodations related to abortion. In May 2024, the states of Mississippi and Louisiana sued the EEOC, arguing that the interpretation conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision and their respective state laws on abortion. In June 2024, Judge Joseph found that the EEOC exceeded its authority and issued a preliminary injunction postponing the effective date of the interpretation to provide accommodation for elective abortions until final judgment was entered in this matter. The final judgment was entered on May 21, 2025, that remanded the matter to the EEOC to revise the final rule and all related implementing regulations and guidances. Employer Takeaways: While employers are no longer (as of now) REQUIRED to provide accommodation for elective abortions, the remainder of the PWFA remains in full effect The decision to have or not have an abortion remains protected under Title VII The PWFA does not supersede state or local laws providing greater protection for pregnant workers. It is important to stay up to date on state regulations to ensure employers are complying with state laws. While it is still unclear how this ruling will impact employers nationwide, it is still important to continue to stay up to date on ever-changing legislation.  If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.