Royal

OSHA Issues Rule Based upon Biden Mandate

Nov 05, 2021
OSHA published its rule putting into effect President Biden’s mandate regarding worker vaccinations

Yesterday, November 4, 2021, OSHA published its rule putting into effect President Biden’s mandate regarding worker vaccinations. The OSHA rule provides some needed clarity for employers in terms of compliance.


The previously announced Biden mandate applies to employers of 100 or more employees, medical facilities that receive funding from Medicare or Medicaid, and federal contractors with a contract value over $250,000. However, the announcement did not address how the number of 100 employees would be calculated. While the OSHA rule clarifies multiple different scenarios of how to calculate the total number of employees (including whether to use independent contractors, or employees working remotely, or employees working in different locations), the rule makes clear that the number of employees is to be calculated using the number of employees as of the date the rule was published. The OSHA rule also clarifies that employers who had adopted a mandatory vaccine policy prior to the Biden mandate are in compliance, even if those policy contains exceptions for employees who are not vaccinated based upon religious grounds and disability/medical grounds.

The OSHA rule also states that covered employers who do not comply could face penalties of $14,000 per violation. Further, employers’ mandatory vaccination plan must be readily accessible to all employees. In addition, the OSHA rule mandates that employers have 30 days from the effective date of the rule to:


  • establish a vaccination policy;
  • determine vaccination status of employees and obtain proof,
  • ensure unvaccinated employees wear face masks at work and in company vehicles; and
  • provide employees information about workplace policies/procedures, and protections against retaliation and discrimination, and also information about laws with potential criminal penalties for supplying false information.


The Rule further clarifies that Employers will have 60 days from the date the rule becomes effective to ensure that unvaccinated employees test weekly.


The new OSHA rule will add a new wrinkle to the constantly fluid situation of compliance with government regulations based upon the COVID 19 pandemic. 


If you have any questions about the new OSHA rule, or any other aspect of employment law, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm.

29 Mar, 2024
The Royal Law Firm is the Best Law Firm in the Pioneer Valley according to the Valley Advocate's readers. The results of the 2024 Best of the Pioneer Valley Readers' Poll were published on Thursday, March 28 th . Thank you to everyone who voted for us, and to those of you who trust us to help you in times of need. Click here to check out all of the category winners and finalists.
28 Mar, 2024
By: Trevor Brice, Esq. For many Americans, the possible leave that can be taken under state and federal leave has been expanded and extended so that many employees are covered by state and federal leave laws. However, this coverage has not extended to all full-time U.S. employees. A new bill in Congress seeks to change this. On March 20, 2024, several House Democrats announced the introduction of the Protected Time Off (“PTO) Act to guarantee 10 paid days off from work each year for full-time workers. The proposal ensures that all full-time employees will earn no less than two weeks of annual paid leave per year, in addition to any employer-provided or legal required paid sick or family leave, to be used for any reason at the employees’ standard pay rate. Employers must not interfere with or discriminate against workers who seek to take annual paid time off. Possible Implications for Employers under the PTO Act The PTO Act offers two weeks of paid time off to any full-time employee for any reason. This means that employers will have to offer this time off as long as employees provide two weeks’ notice, which is required under the law. Employers with surge seasons will be particularly affected by this act, because, as long as notice is provided, employers cannot deny the time off, unless the surge season qualifies as an emergency under the Act. An employer may place limited, reasonable restrictions regarding the scheduling of paid annual leave and may reject a scheduling request for such leave for a bona fide business reason, so long as the employer provides other reasonable alternative times for the employee to schedule such leave. However, the definition of reasonable alternative times would have to be tested in court, as it is not defined in the pending legislation. Employees would begin to accrue paid leave as soon as their employment begins and employers must provide each employee with no less no less than 1 hour of paid annual leave for every 25 hours worked, for up to 80 total hours. Employees can start using PTO Act leave on the 60 th day of their employment. Employers will need to compensate employees at the same rate that they would have been paid had the employees not used leave. Further, employees are allowed to carry over up to 40 hours of leave year to year and can cash out any unused paid annual leave at the separation of employment. If employers violate the PTO Act, employers may be responsible for lost wages, interest, liquidated (double) damages, and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. While an individual bringing a claim under the PTO Act may not scare employers, as it could be on the hook for up to four weeks of pay plus attorney’s fees and costs at maximum, a class action on behalf of multiple employees could certainly be something that employers fear. Takeaways The PTO Act, while introduced in the House, is not likely to advance and become law with bipartisan support. However, it is of note that legislators feel comfortable advancing legislation that would give paid leave to all full-time employees. In this sense, it is more likely that a lesser version of the PTO Act could be passed in the coming months and years, which could burden employers with more regulation related to paid leave. As always, if an employer has questions or concerns about the utilization of paid leave and the application of new potential laws like the PTO Act, it is prudent to seek legal counsel. Trevor Brice is an attorney who specializes in labor and employment-law matters at the Royal Law Firm LLP, a woman-owned, women-managed corporate law firm that is certified as a women’s business enterprise with the Massachusetts Supplier Diversity Office, the National Assoc. of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms, and the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council.
Share by: