OSHA Proposal to Require Employers to Submit Information Electronically

April 7, 2022

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) is seeking to amend its injury and illness recordkeeping regulations. Currently, OSHA requires certain employers to electronically submit to OSHA certain injury and illness information which they are mandated to keep. Its new proposal includes the use of artificial intelligence software to identify and redact employee names, while leaving all references to employee health information upon submission by the employer. This could lead to potential public disclosure of employee health information, presenting a tremendous risk for employers.



In addition, OSHA’s new proposal aims to remove the current requirement for establishments, not in a designated industry, with 250 or more employees to electronically submit information from its Form 300A to OSHA annually and require establishments with 100 or more employees in certain high-hazard industries, such as construction or roofing, to electronically submit information from its OSHA Forms 300, 301 and 300A to OSHA once a year. These forms are important because they are used by employers to keep a log of work-related illnesses and injuries, as well as, provide a summary of how the injuries or illnesses transpired, containing highly personal medical information. It would also update the classification system used to determine the list of industries covered by the electronic submission requirement and require establishments to include its company name when making electronic submissions to OSHA.



Of note, establishments with 20 or more employees in designated high-hazard industries would continue to be required to electronically submit information from its OSHA Form 300A annual summary to OSHA.




For more information on OSHA regulations, or any other employment or labor law matter, please contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm LLP; (413) 586-2288. We know business matters!

December 5, 2025
Our attorneys successfully obtained summary judgment in favor of the Defendant from the Massachusetts Appeals Court in a Wage Act and contract dispute. The Complainant alleged entitlement to a substantial variable compensation award following resignation. We demonstrated that the compensation plan made such awards discretionary and contingent on continued employment at the time of payout. The Appeals Court agreed, finding that the award did not constitute wages under the Wage Act and that the Defendant acted lawfully in denying payment. All claims were dismissed in their entirety.
By The Royal Law Firm November 5, 2025
Attorney Amy Royal has once again been selected as a Super Lawyer ! As published by Super Lawyers Amy B. Royal is a top-rated attorney, with her firm headquartered in Springfield, Massachusetts. Providing legal representation in the New England states and New York, for a variety of different issues, Amy Royal was selected to Super Lawyers for 2014 - 2016, 2019 - 2025. Attorneys like Amy B. Royal are recognized by their peers for their outstanding work and commitment to the spirit of the legal profession. Their knowledge of the law, professional work ethic, and advocacy on behalf of their clients allow them to stand out among other attorneys in the field.