Are the House and Senate Trying to Ban Your Noncompete Agreements?

March 1, 2023

The House and Senate have recently introduced a bill that would ban noncompete agreements.


The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced a proposal, which would eliminate noncompete agreements, except in limited situations.


The proposed Workforce Mobility Act of 2023, by the House and Senate, would disallow individuals and businesses entering, enforcing, or attempting to enforce noncompete agreements. The FTC’s proposal would apply to past, present, and future noncompete agreements, while the Workforce Mobility Act would only apply to those agreements entered after the bill is enacted.

The proposed bill provides three limited exceptions in which noncompete agreements would still be valid:

  • When the sale of goodwill or ownership interests in a business takes place, the buyer could include a noncompete provision in the contract to bar the seller from running a similar business in the same geographic area.
  • A buyer or seller of goodwill or ownership interests in a business could enter into a severance agreement with senior executives including a noncompete provision that applies for up to one year, only in the geographic region where the company previously operated. Such an agreement must provide for severance payments of at least one year’s salary or compensation if employment is terminated.
  • Noncompete provisions would be allowed for the purpose of stopping departing partners from running similar businesses in the same geographic area if the partnership is dissolved.


This bill would create a private form of action for the individuals against employers for violations of the bill. Recovery would encompass actual damages and attorney fees.


Moreover, state attorneys general could in fact bring claims against the employers as well for violations of the proposed bill.


This is an update from our January 11, 2023 post, titled The FTC Proposes Rule to Ban Noncompete Clauses for all US Workers. Click here to read that post!


If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

Brandon Calton admitted to the United States District Court of Connecticut

June 10, 2025
Brandon Calton is now admitted to the United States District Court, Connecticut! The Royal Law Firm is passionate about expanding our reach so that we can better serve our clients and their needs. Brandon is admitted in Massachusetts, the United States District Court of Massachusetts, and the United States District Court of Connecticut.

Federal Court Vacates EEOC’s “Abortion Accommodation Mandate” in PWFA

By Heather Child • June 9, 2025
On May 21, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana struck down a provision in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) final rule under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), ruling that the agency exceeded its authority by requiring employers to accommodate elective abortions that are not medically necessary. Background Information: In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and eliminated the constitutional right to abortion. Congress passed the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act in December 2022, and it became effective in June 2023. The law requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodation to qualified applicants or employees who have physical or mental conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense for the employer. In April 2024, The EEOC issued its final interpretation of the PWFA including abortion in the definition of “pregnancy, childbirth, or other related medical conditions” thereby requiring employers to provide accommodations related to abortion. In May 2024, the states of Mississippi and Louisiana sued the EEOC, arguing that the interpretation conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision and their respective state laws on abortion. In June 2024, Judge Joseph found that the EEOC exceeded its authority and issued a preliminary injunction postponing the effective date of the interpretation to provide accommodation for elective abortions until final judgment was entered in this matter. The final judgment was entered on May 21, 2025, that remanded the matter to the EEOC to revise the final rule and all related implementing regulations and guidances. Employer Takeaways: While employers are no longer (as of now) REQUIRED to provide accommodation for elective abortions, the remainder of the PWFA remains in full effect The decision to have or not have an abortion remains protected under Title VII The PWFA does not supersede state or local laws providing greater protection for pregnant workers. It is important to stay up to date on state regulations to ensure employers are complying with state laws. While it is still unclear how this ruling will impact employers nationwide, it is still important to continue to stay up to date on ever-changing legislation.  If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.