New Guidance for Remote Work and Leave

March 13, 2023

In February 2023, the federal Department of Labor (DOL) issued new guidance about employees working remotely from home.


The DOL confirmed that the rules for compensating employees, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), for break time apply whether the employee is working onsite or remote. Break times of 20 minutes or less are treated as compensable time.  A longer break is not compensable time, so long as the employee is completely relieved from duties, which is defined as: (i) being “told in advance that they may leave the job and they will not have to commence work until a specified hour,” or (ii) that they may “freely choose the hour at which they resume working and the time is long enough for the employees to effectively use their own purposes.” The DOL also noted the FLSA’s requirement to provide reasonable break time for employees to express breast milk for their nursing child with a space that is “shielded from view” also applies to remote work. This means “ensuring that an employee is free from observation by any employer provided or required video system”. Such breaks are also compensable if the employee is not completely relieved from duties.


The DOL also discussed Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) eligibility requirements. An employer with at least 50 employees within a 75 mile radius of the worksite must provide FMLA benefits to employees who have worked 1,250 hours in the preceding 12 months. The DOL explained that for remote employees the pertinent worksite is not their residence but is “the office to which they report or from which their assignments are made.” 


The DOL also addressed whether an employer is required to allow an employee, with an FMLA-covered serious health condition, to use FMLA leave to shorten their workday where the regular schedule for the position would otherwise be more. The DOL stated that employees who are eligible for FMLA leave must be permitted to take it on a reduced schedule basis, and that an employer may not simply reduce their workday as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA thereby making them ineligible for group health insurance benefits. Eligible employees must be permitted to use FMLA leave until they have exhausted their leave, and if a reduced schedule does not result in the equivalent of 12 weeks of leave in a 12-month period, the employer is required to provide it indefinitely. Also, the hours of FMLA leave the employee is entitled must be based on the employee’s regularly scheduled workweek, and not on the reduced one, so an employee who is regularly scheduled 50-hours per week (not counting voluntary overtime) would be entitled to use 600 hours of FMLA leave in a 12-month period, to shorten their schedule to 40 hours per week. Lastly, the DOL found that if an employee, who requires a reduced schedule, exhausts their FMLA leave, the employer is obligated to consider continuing the reduction as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA, and an employee may offer, and an employee may voluntarily accept, a reduced schedule as a reasonable accommodation in lieu of taking FMLA leave.


As a result, more remote employees are likely to meet the FMLA’s eligibility requirements than employers may have previously assumed.  Employers with a remote workforce should check their wage and hour and FMLA policies to ensure compliance, as well as consider the applicability of the FMLA when an employee requests a reduced schedule as an accommodation.


If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

June 10, 2025
Brandon Calton is now admitted to the United States District Court, Connecticut! The Royal Law Firm is passionate about expanding our reach so that we can better serve our clients and their needs. Brandon is admitted in Massachusetts, the United States District Court of Massachusetts, and the United States District Court of Connecticut.
By Heather Child June 9, 2025
On May 21, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana struck down a provision in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) final rule under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), ruling that the agency exceeded its authority by requiring employers to accommodate elective abortions that are not medically necessary. Background Information: In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and eliminated the constitutional right to abortion. Congress passed the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act in December 2022, and it became effective in June 2023. The law requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodation to qualified applicants or employees who have physical or mental conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense for the employer. In April 2024, The EEOC issued its final interpretation of the PWFA including abortion in the definition of “pregnancy, childbirth, or other related medical conditions” thereby requiring employers to provide accommodations related to abortion. In May 2024, the states of Mississippi and Louisiana sued the EEOC, arguing that the interpretation conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision and their respective state laws on abortion. In June 2024, Judge Joseph found that the EEOC exceeded its authority and issued a preliminary injunction postponing the effective date of the interpretation to provide accommodation for elective abortions until final judgment was entered in this matter. The final judgment was entered on May 21, 2025, that remanded the matter to the EEOC to revise the final rule and all related implementing regulations and guidances. Employer Takeaways: While employers are no longer (as of now) REQUIRED to provide accommodation for elective abortions, the remainder of the PWFA remains in full effect The decision to have or not have an abortion remains protected under Title VII The PWFA does not supersede state or local laws providing greater protection for pregnant workers. It is important to stay up to date on state regulations to ensure employers are complying with state laws. While it is still unclear how this ruling will impact employers nationwide, it is still important to continue to stay up to date on ever-changing legislation.  If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.