MA PFML Clarification of Accrued Benefits

September 20, 2024

On September 13, 2024, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the Massachusetts Paid Family and Medical Leave Act (PFMLA) does not guarantee the accrual of benefits such as sick leave, vacation leave, or length-of-service credit during periods of paid family or medical leave. Instead, the law stipulates that upon returning from leave, employees should have benefits equivalent to those they had before taking leave. This means employers are only obligated to maintain existing benefits, without the need to provide additional benefits during the leave period.

 

Prior to this ruling, it was uncertain whether benefits would continue to accrue while an employee was on paid leave. The court clarified that employers are not required to continue accruing benefits like vacation or sick leave during PMFLA leave.


4 Key Takeaways

1.   Benefit Accruals: Employers are not required to accrue benefits such as vacation and sick leave while an employee is on PFMLA leave. Instead, focus on restoring the employee’s benefit status to what it was prior to leaving.

 

2.   Health Insurance: While accrual of benefits like vacation time is not mandatory, employers must maintain the employee’s health insurance coverage at the same level during their PFMLA leave, including continuing contributions to health benefits.

 

3.   Job Restoration and Retaliation Protections: Employees have the right to return to their former job or an equivalent position after PFMLA leave.

 

4.   Consistency with Other Leave Policies: Employers should review internal policies and collective bargaining agreements to ensure they align with this ruling.


It is extremely important for employers to understand these rules to ensure compliance in the workplace and prevent any future litigation.


If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.

June 10, 2025
Brandon Calton is now admitted to the United States District Court, Connecticut! The Royal Law Firm is passionate about expanding our reach so that we can better serve our clients and their needs. Brandon is admitted in Massachusetts, the United States District Court of Massachusetts, and the United States District Court of Connecticut.
By Heather Child June 9, 2025
On May 21, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana struck down a provision in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) final rule under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), ruling that the agency exceeded its authority by requiring employers to accommodate elective abortions that are not medically necessary. Background Information: In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and eliminated the constitutional right to abortion. Congress passed the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act in December 2022, and it became effective in June 2023. The law requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodation to qualified applicants or employees who have physical or mental conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense for the employer. In April 2024, The EEOC issued its final interpretation of the PWFA including abortion in the definition of “pregnancy, childbirth, or other related medical conditions” thereby requiring employers to provide accommodations related to abortion. In May 2024, the states of Mississippi and Louisiana sued the EEOC, arguing that the interpretation conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision and their respective state laws on abortion. In June 2024, Judge Joseph found that the EEOC exceeded its authority and issued a preliminary injunction postponing the effective date of the interpretation to provide accommodation for elective abortions until final judgment was entered in this matter. The final judgment was entered on May 21, 2025, that remanded the matter to the EEOC to revise the final rule and all related implementing regulations and guidances. Employer Takeaways: While employers are no longer (as of now) REQUIRED to provide accommodation for elective abortions, the remainder of the PWFA remains in full effect The decision to have or not have an abortion remains protected under Title VII The PWFA does not supersede state or local laws providing greater protection for pregnant workers. It is important to stay up to date on state regulations to ensure employers are complying with state laws. While it is still unclear how this ruling will impact employers nationwide, it is still important to continue to stay up to date on ever-changing legislation.  If your business has any questions on this topic or any other matters, please do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Royal Law Firm at 413-586-2288.